Open Source Sells Planes
Another one from the Wikileaks archive, in which Japan choose Open Source European fighter jets over closed American fighters.
http://wikileaks.org/cable/2009/08/09TOKYO1813.html
While U.S. weapons are shrouded in secrecy like a “black box,” BAE
Systems takes pride in “open source.”
Latham said: “We are willing to meet Japan’s requirements, whether
it is licensed production or importation.”
MOD officials in charge of arms trade with the U.S. have taken note
of BAE Systems’ posture of emphasizing the merits for Japan. A
senior ASDF officer says:
“Actually, the top secret documents in the MOD mostly consist of
information on U.S. weapons. When parts designated as top secret
black box break down, they need to be sent back to the manufacturer
in the U.S. for repairs. Sometimes, these parts are left unattended
for extended periods of time due to circumstances on the other side.
It is possible that we will not be able to use them at a critical
moment.”
and just to rub in how much they value access to the source code:
When Tamogami was in active service, he told this reporter: “We need
only some 50 FXs. I have a feeling that since the number is small,
the U.S. will not object too strongly if we choose the Eurofighter.
If the U.S. is willing to open up the black box of the F-35, we are
willing to consider it.”
Obviously in this example they might not be talking about Free Software as such, I have no idea if the BAE fighter control software is licensed under the GPL or another copyleft license or if it is more of a “published but proprietary” thing. Either way, having the right to know what their hardware is being commanded to do is important to Japan, and it should be to you too.
[…] http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2011/09/05/open-source-sells-planes/ […]
This is not just Japan, but the UK as well. When I was a contractor at Lockheed-Martin, the UK government nearly pulled out of the F-35 program, because the US were refusing to grant BAe access to certain parts of the source code; even though they were partners.
yeah, I love the comment that all the UK top secret stuff is things we figured out about the American hardware, our own stuff isn’t top secret
There is an amusing instance where code can satisfied Free Software ideals but completely fail to be open source. It’s where the users (Japan, UK etc) have access and rights to the code, but the code isn’t actually published anywhere.
After all Free Software is concerned with users having rights over the things that they own.
yes, I agree. They have Freedom 1, and they are paying for Freedom 1 (and Freedom 0 I guess). It is unlikely that they have Freedoms 2 and 3 but in this scenario the Software Freedom that is mission critical is Freedom 1, they are not so bothered about the others, and yes money changes hands, but that isn’t massively relevant to the Free in Free Software.