<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Open Sourcerer &#187; Mark Shuttleworth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theopensourcerer.com/tag/mark-shuttleworth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com</link>
	<description>The Magic of Open Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sam Varghese Got It Wrong?</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2010/02/15/sam-varghese-got-it-wrong/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sam-varghese-got-it-wrong</link>
		<comments>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2010/02/15/sam-varghese-got-it-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Lord</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FLOSS in the news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canonical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gimp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Shuttleworth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Asay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=2257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the 10th of February I updated my original &#8220;Is Canonical becoming the new Microsoft?&#8221; post to make it clearer that what I was actually asking was about whether the company is becoming the next organisation that we love to hate because of the increasing level of criticism aimed at it and it&#8217;s flagship product [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the 10th of February I <a href="http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2010/02/10/follow-up-post-to-canonical-microsoft/">updated</a> my <a href="http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2010/02/09/is-canonical-becoming-the-new-microsoft/">original</a> &#8220;Is Canonical becoming the new Microsoft?&#8221; post to make it clearer that what I was <em>actually asking</em> was about whether the company is becoming the next organisation that we <em><strong>love to hate</strong></em> because of the increasing level of criticism aimed at it and it&#8217;s flagship product <a href="http://www.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu</a>. </p>
<p>Today, the 15th February, <a href="http://www.itwire.com/sam-varghese">Sam Varghese</a> has written about a conversation <a href="http://www.itwire.com/opinion-and-analysis/open-sauce/36820-im-not-driven-by-microsoft-hatred-shuttleworth">iTWire have had</a> with Mark Shuttleworth regarding my original post. Unfortunately not only does he seem to have missed the point of that original post, but he also writes as though I was making an accusation or statement rather than asking a question:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;He was responding to queries from iTWire about a recent blog post that has claimed  Canonical is becoming the new Microsoft.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>He goes on to list some of the points I made:</p>
<blockquote><p>The blog post had listed a number of reasons why the writer thought Ubuntu was allegedly becoming the new Microsoft: the inclusion of Mono as a default; the creation of Ubuntu One, a proprietary software repository; removing the GIMP and other applications from Ubuntu; changing the default search engine to Yahoo!; discussion about what proprietary applications should be included in the Ubuntu repositories; and the appointment of Matt Asay as chief operating officer.</p></blockquote>
<p>Please, let&#8217;s get this straight. I have noteworthy opinions on one or two of the points I mentioned, but that was not the point of the post. They were supposed to be taken as examples of a collection of decisions that are apparently, in various quarters, providing the fuel for an increase of criticism overall.</p>
<p>Personally I really am not bothered about the Gimp being removed (it is easy to install), nor OpenOffice.org from the UNR (I actually install the desktop edition on my netbook anyway), nor am I upset about Ubuntu One; it&#8217;s an interesting solution, I use it sometimes myself and I&#8217;m sure a Windows version will be most welcome by many around the globe. Neither <a href="http://popey.com/blog/2010/01/26/yahoobuntu/#comment-1893">am I bothered</a> about the Yahoo search thing (If Canonical can get money from Microsoft then that&#8217;s just funny IMHO), and I was actually pleased about <a href="https://twitter.com/opensourcerer/status/8680203428">Matt Asay&#8217;s appointment</a>; he will bring a wealth of commercial experience, a good dose of much needed sales &#038; marketing skills to the operation and I&#8217;m sure much more besides.</p>
<p>Sam also didn&#8217;t mention any of this from my original post:</p>
<blockquote><p>I really like Ubuntu. I use it everywhere, I help in the Ubuntu-uk irc channel when I can and we [our company] promote Ubuntu to our customers and I [as an individual] to friends and family.</p>
<p>What concerns me is not any particular item in the list above: some I care about, others I do not; as I am sure many of you will do too. It is the increasing volume of criticism and vitriol as a whole. It is getting louder. This, I believe, is indicative of a turning tide that, if we are not careful, will result in Ubuntu losing popularity and more of the FOSS community exercising it’s freedom.</p></blockquote>
<p>I did not claim Canonical was becoming the new Microsoft. I asked if it might be. I also (admittedly not very clearly on my first pass) was interested in the reasons why Canonical/Ubuntu is getting more criticism directed at it at a time when it is becoming more successful and more important and was hoping to solicit some ideas and opinion as to how we could stop that increasing criticism and prevent what seems to be a fairly common occurrence with big and successful companies; we are even seeing it with Google now. Ubuntu/Canonical is built on very different principles to traditional commercial enterprises, so could we, as the community, come up with any ideas to prevent the &#8220;love-to-hate&#8221; syndrome?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t read iTWire much. I only noticed this post from Sam as I had a couple of referred clicks to this blog today and was interested in where they were coming from.  </p>
<p>Sam, your article paints me with a brush which I do not believe to be fair or accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2010/02/15/sam-varghese-got-it-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to remove Mono from Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope [Updated]</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/04/23/how-to-remove-mono-from-ubuntu-904-jaunty-jackalope/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-to-remove-mono-from-ubuntu-904-jaunty-jackalope</link>
		<comments>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/04/23/how-to-remove-mono-from-ubuntu-904-jaunty-jackalope/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Lord</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FLOSS in the news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Runes and tales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Open Learning Centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-Spot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gNote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaunty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Shuttleworth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tomboy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s that time again Fortunately, Mono is still quite trivial to remove and has not, apparently, increased its infiltration of the Ubuntu/Gnome code base as one might have been led to believe if you&#8217;d read this on the 1st April: &#8220;Mark Shuttleworth, the Benevolent Dictator for Life of the popular Ubuntu Linux distro, has announced [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://tuxradar.com/content/ubuntu-rewrite-linux-kernel-using-mono"><img title="SABDFL groks Mono" src="http://www.theopensourcerer.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/shuttleworth_mono.jpg" alt="SABDFL groks Mono" width="300" height="355" align="right" style="padding:0 0 10px 10px;" /></a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s that <a href="http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/11/17/the-mono-effect/">time</a> again <img src='http://www.theopensourcerer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Fortunately, Mono is still quite trivial to remove and has not, apparently, increased its infiltration of the Ubuntu/Gnome code base as one might have been led to believe if you&#8217;d read <a href="http://tuxradar.com/content/ubuntu-rewrite-linux-kernel-using-mono">this</a> on the 1st April:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Mark Shuttleworth, the Benevolent Dictator for Life of the popular Ubuntu Linux distro, has announced his plans to rewrite all of Gnome, X11 and the Linux kernel using the Mono platform&#8230;</p>
<p>Ubuntu is Linux for human beings, and, believe it or not, Microsoft employees are human beings too. We think we need to work closer with Microsoft to ensure heterogenous data silo paradigm middleware enhancements can continue to grow. Oh, and they gave me this nice T-shirt.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>As was the case with 8.10 Intrepid Ibex, there are just two applications in the default Jaunty desktop install which depend on Mono: F-Spot and Tomboy.</p>
<p>As an alternative to F-Spot, I happily use the Gnome viewer <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GThumb">gThumb</a> for managing the import and deletion of images from our digital cameras. I actually think it is better for a simple reason. It allows me to copy the images off my camera and delete them from the camera at the same time. The last time I tried F-Spot (admittedly quite a while ago now) I could never find a setting to do this.</p>
<p>And for note taking I have been happily using <a href="http://notecase.sourceforge.net/">notecase</a>. Although I note [pun intended] that the developer has stopped work on the free version himself the code is available under a BSD license so if anyone wants to pick it up and run with it they can. Anyway &#8211; notecase works fine for me and is still in the repos.</p>
<p>There are many other note taking type applications too. Here is what looks to be quite a comprehensive (albeit old) list of them: <a href="http://linuxappfinder.com/utilities/notes">http://linuxappfinder.com/utilities/notes</a></p>
<h3>But this is just GREAT!</h3>
<p><a href="http://live.gnome.org/Gnote"><img style="padding:10px 10px 10px 0;" title="Gnote: Tomboy minus Mono" src="http://www.theopensourcerer.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/screenshot.png" alt="Gnote: Tomboy minus Mono" width="525" height="537" align="left" /></a><br />
Whilst I was preparing this article, I came across <a href="http://www.figuiere.net/hub/blog/?2009/04/01/656-porting-to-cplusplus">this</a> on April 1st too. I actually did think it was a joke.</p>
<p>However it seems not; a bored and unemployed (ex Novell/Suse) developer, <a href="http://www.figuiere.net/hub/blog/">Hubert Figuière</a>, is porting [has ported] Tomboy to C++ and calls it <a href="http://live.gnome.org/Gnote">Gnote</a>.</p>
<p>You can now use a virtually identical application to Tomboy without Mono! (This is still an early development so YMMV).</p>
<p>There is a PPA for Ubuntu <a href="https://launchpad.net/~gnote/+archive/ppa">here</a> very kindly organised by <a href="http://vadi.myopenid.com/">Vadim Peretokin</a>. I installed it on my intrepid desktop just to see it and it looks exactly the same as Tomboy!</p>
<p>Even better, as it isn&#8217;t built on top of Mono, it has fairly meagre requirements too:</p>
<p><code>sudo apt-get install gnote<br />
[sudo] password for alord:<br />
Reading package lists... Done<br />
Building dependency tree<br />
Reading state information... Done<br />
The following NEW packages will be installed<br />
gnote libboost-filesystem1.34.1 libboost-regex1.34.1 libxml++2.6-2<br />
0 upgraded, 4 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.<br />
1 not fully installed or removed.<br />
Need to get 1130kB of archives.<br />
After this operation, 3400kB of additional disk space will be used.<br />
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Y</code></p>
<p><strong>3.4MB vs. 54.0MB. That&#8217;s a decent comparison I think.</strong></p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
<h3>OK. The moment you&#8217;ve all been waiting for&#8230;</h3>
<h4>To remove that <em>patent-trap-masquerading-as-free-software</em> from your Shiny New Ubuntu Jaunty system simply type:</h4>
<p><code>sudo apt-get purge libmono0 mono-common libgdiplus</code></p>
<p>[UPDATE]<br />
Thanks to a keen eyed <a href="http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/04/23/how-to-remove-mono-from-ubuntu-904-jaunty-jackalope/comment-page-1/#comment-10468">commenter</a>, <a href="http://www.thelupine.com/thelupine/">Lupine</a>, we note that there is another package that lurks hidden and must be <strong>explicitly</strong> removed. I have added <code>libgdiplus</code> to this command since first publishing. To remove it individually just enter <code>sudo apt-get purge libgdiplus</code>. Thanks Lupine.<br />
[/UPDATE]</p>
<p>Then watch what happens next&#8230;</p>
<p><code>The following packages will be REMOVED<br />
f-spot* libart2.24-cil* libflickrnet2.1.5-cil* libgconf2.24-cil* libglade2.0-cil* libglib2.0-cil* libgmime2.2a-cil* libgnome-keyring1.0-cil* libgnome-vfs2.24-cil* libgnome2.24-cil* libgnomepanel2.24-cil* libgtk2.0-cil* libmono-addins-gui0.2-cil* libmono-addins0.2-cil* libmono-cairo2.0-cil* libmono-corlib2.0-cil* libmono-data-tds2.0-cil* libmono-data2.0-cil* libmono-getoptions2.0-cil* libmono-i18n2.0-cil* libmono-posix2.0-cil* libmono-security2.0-cil* libmono-sharpzip2.84-cil* libmono-sqlite2.0-cil* libmono-system-data2.0-cil* libmono-system-web2.0-cil* libmono-system2.0-cil* libmono0* libmono2.0-cil* libndesk-dbus-glib1.0-cil* libndesk-dbus1.0-cil* mono-2.0-gac* mono-2.0-runtime* mono-common* mono-gac* mono-jit* mono-runtime* tomboy*<br />
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 38 to remove.<br />
After this operation, 54.0MB disk space will be freed.<br />
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?</code></p>
<p>Oh yes please&#8230;</p>
<p>To wrap up this post, we&#8217;ve been using Jaunty on various devices for some time now. It&#8217;s been really stable, boots very fast and is probably the best desktop operating system you can get anywhere and for any price right now. Thanks to Canonical and the rest of the amazing FOSS Community for making Ubuntu and this release happen.</p>
<p>Our <a href="http://www.theopenlearningcentre.com/libertus.html">Libertus Server Appliances</a>, with the Mono-free Jaunty 9.04 server edition, are available from today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/04/23/how-to-remove-mono-from-ubuntu-904-jaunty-jackalope/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

