<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Redhat/Fedora drops Mono</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/06/02/redhatfedora-drops-mono/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/06/02/redhatfedora-drops-mono/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=redhatfedora-drops-mono</link>
	<description>The Magic of Open Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:02:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pollycoke :) &#187; Fedora 11 &#8220;Leonidas&#8221;, ecco cosa mi piace</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/06/02/redhatfedora-drops-mono/comment-page-1/#comment-11529</link>
		<dc:creator>pollycoke :) &#187; Fedora 11 &#8220;Leonidas&#8221;, ecco cosa mi piace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 09:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=1292#comment-11529</guid>
		<description>[...] Ultimo ma non per importanza: come segnalato da Lorenzo e ricordato da Andrea, grazie a GNote questa versione di Fedora non avrà Mono! (cfr theopensourcerer) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ultimo ma non per importanza: come segnalato da Lorenzo e ricordato da Andrea, grazie a GNote questa versione di Fedora non avrà Mono! (cfr theopensourcerer) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubuntu Sets Example by Defying Mono Threats &#124; hallowdemon.com</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/06/02/redhatfedora-drops-mono/comment-page-1/#comment-10755</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubuntu Sets Example by Defying Mono Threats &#124; hallowdemon.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=1292#comment-10755</guid>
		<description>[...] went to bed with Microsoft in 2006 to achieve a guarantee of immunity, while Red Hat and Fedora announced plans earlier this year to phase out the use of Mono in their default application line [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] went to bed with Microsoft in 2006 to achieve a guarantee of immunity, while Red Hat and Fedora announced plans earlier this year to phase out the use of Mono in their default application line [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: To Mono or not to Mono? &#171; Sound and Complete</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/06/02/redhatfedora-drops-mono/comment-page-1/#comment-10546</link>
		<dc:creator>To Mono or not to Mono? &#171; Sound and Complete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=1292#comment-10546</guid>
		<description>[...] default note-taking application in Fedora 12 instead of Tomboy, which will enable Fedora team to drop Mono out of their default configuration, and the reason for that is not only the free space [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] default note-taking application in Fedora 12 instead of Tomboy, which will enable Fedora team to drop Mono out of their default configuration, and the reason for that is not only the free space [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob K.</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/06/02/redhatfedora-drops-mono/comment-page-1/#comment-10526</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=1292#comment-10526</guid>
		<description>Ok, I see everyone wanting mono apps removed. So hear is a question to all of you. What apps are going to replace the mono apps that are removed. Remeber that they should be equal in every respect as to functionality and features. And they should not be replaced until the alternative app is equal if not better before inclusion. (Ex:gnote is still not equal in all respects to Tomboy in features and functionality), therefore should not be included by default till completed. Replacing the mono apps with inferior apps just defeats the purpose of displaying the advantages of your product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I see everyone wanting mono apps removed. So hear is a question to all of you. What apps are going to replace the mono apps that are removed. Remeber that they should be equal in every respect as to functionality and features. And they should not be replaced until the alternative app is equal if not better before inclusion. (Ex:gnote is still not equal in all respects to Tomboy in features and functionality), therefore should not be included by default till completed. Replacing the mono apps with inferior apps just defeats the purpose of displaying the advantages of your product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yeah</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/06/02/redhatfedora-drops-mono/comment-page-1/#comment-10503</link>
		<dc:creator>yeah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=1292#comment-10503</guid>
		<description>yeah! Time to try Fedora again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah! Time to try Fedora again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gigi</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/06/02/redhatfedora-drops-mono/comment-page-1/#comment-10496</link>
		<dc:creator>Gigi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 04:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=1292#comment-10496</guid>
		<description>I have been using gnote for about 3 months now on KDE, GNOME, Fluxbox and openbox on F10 and F11. It works correctly on all of these. It is a good move to include gnote instead of tomboy since a normal tomboy alone install takes 30MB of download and 98MB of installed space on disk(with mono) compared to about 2MB download and 10MB usage for gnote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using gnote for about 3 months now on KDE, GNOME, Fluxbox and openbox on F10 and F11. It works correctly on all of these. It is a good move to include gnote instead of tomboy since a normal tomboy alone install takes 30MB of download and 98MB of installed space on disk(with mono) compared to about 2MB download and 10MB usage for gnote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/06/02/redhatfedora-drops-mono/comment-page-1/#comment-10450</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=1292#comment-10450</guid>
		<description>Dare I mention another great option that avoids Mono entirely?

KDE4.

As an added bonus it runs quite a bit faster than GNOME on any systems that has working hardware-accelerated graphics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dare I mention another great option that avoids Mono entirely?</p>
<p>KDE4.</p>
<p>As an added bonus it runs quite a bit faster than GNOME on any systems that has working hardware-accelerated graphics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HC</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/06/02/redhatfedora-drops-mono/comment-page-1/#comment-10448</link>
		<dc:creator>HC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=1292#comment-10448</guid>
		<description>Good deal Red Hat! I am coming back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good deal Red Hat! I am coming back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turtlewax</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/06/02/redhatfedora-drops-mono/comment-page-1/#comment-10444</link>
		<dc:creator>turtlewax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=1292#comment-10444</guid>
		<description>I like having the choice to install mono. Trouble is, making it &quot;optional&quot; effectively makes it inaccessible in some situations. For example web-hosting servers, or any environment where &quot;options&quot; are ratcheted down by bureaucracy. No harm done though; Ubuntu works fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like having the choice to install mono. Trouble is, making it &#8220;optional&#8221; effectively makes it inaccessible in some situations. For example web-hosting servers, or any environment where &#8220;options&#8221; are ratcheted down by bureaucracy. No harm done though; Ubuntu works fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Enderland</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/06/02/redhatfedora-drops-mono/comment-page-1/#comment-10441</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Enderland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=1292#comment-10441</guid>
		<description>Very nice site. I found it from one of your SJVN comments. I&#039;ve linked you to my blog. Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice site. I found it from one of your SJVN comments. I&#8217;ve linked you to my blog. Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

