<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Thoughts on the UK Government Open Source Action Plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/05/17/new-thoughts-on-uk-gov-foss-action-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/05/17/new-thoughts-on-uk-gov-foss-action-plan/</link>
	<description>The Magic of Open Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:04:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Suffolk</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/05/17/new-thoughts-on-uk-gov-foss-action-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-10397</link>
		<dc:creator>John Suffolk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 10:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=1227#comment-10397</guid>
		<description>Thanks for all of the comments, we welcome them. It can be really difficult to get a pitch right in a document.  All the policies I have issued we have kept purposefully short - c 9 pages.  That way they get read and commented on.  However they don&#039;t always hit everyone&#039;s buttons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all of the comments, we welcome them. It can be really difficult to get a pitch right in a document.  All the policies I have issued we have kept purposefully short &#8211; c 9 pages.  That way they get read and commented on.  However they don&#8217;t always hit everyone&#8217;s buttons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CatTaylor</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/05/17/new-thoughts-on-uk-gov-foss-action-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-10392</link>
		<dc:creator>CatTaylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 19:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=1227#comment-10392</guid>
		<description>I wonder, where this leaves the whole initiative? http://tinyurl.com/kmr8sb 

If this doesn&#039;t just sanction the continuing moronic behaviour, and further embed Microsoft into the Public Sector then I am a Dutchman.  

I would love to see the workings out on it - and you know? 75 million is relatively small beer.  If you look at the total spend over the same period..........if only we knew waht that was now. #ukgovOSS #open source/standards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder, where this leaves the whole initiative? <a href="http://tinyurl.com/kmr8sb" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/kmr8sb</a> </p>
<p>If this doesn&#8217;t just sanction the continuing moronic behaviour, and further embed Microsoft into the Public Sector then I am a Dutchman.  </p>
<p>I would love to see the workings out on it &#8211; and you know? 75 million is relatively small beer.  If you look at the total spend over the same period&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.if only we knew waht that was now. #ukgovOSS #open source/standards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 18/05/2009: GNU/Linux and Sugar Victorious on OLPC? &#124; All about MICROSOFT</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/05/17/new-thoughts-on-uk-gov-foss-action-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-10335</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 18/05/2009: GNU/Linux and Sugar Victorious on OLPC? &#124; All about MICROSOFT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 23:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=1227#comment-10335</guid>
		<description>[...] New Thoughts on the UK Government Open Source Action Plan Remember when, back in late February, the Cabinet Office released their “Open Source, Open Standards and Re–Use: Government Action Plan”? Myself and many other FOSS commentators were obviously heartily encouraged and have talked about it and examined the policy in some detail. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New Thoughts on the UK Government Open Source Action Plan Remember when, back in late February, the Cabinet Office released their “Open Source, Open Standards and Re–Use: Government Action Plan”? Myself and many other FOSS commentators were obviously heartily encouraged and have talked about it and examined the policy in some detail. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2009/05/17/new-thoughts-on-uk-gov-foss-action-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-10317</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 19:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=1227#comment-10317</guid>
		<description>Along the lines of the missing stakeholder I have a few concerns about the end of the foreword to the action plan:


&lt;blockquote&gt;This open source strategy addresses these key points. It sets out the steps we need to take across Government, and with our IT suppliers, to &lt;strong&gt;take advantage of&lt;/strong&gt; the benefits of open source.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;


I for one don&#039;t particularly want to be taken advantage of. I am not best keen on being leveraged either (a term I have seen somewhere in relation to this but I can&#039;t find right now). This is community developed software. A community that welcomes with open arms the involvement of new &lt;strong&gt;participants&lt;/strong&gt;. You can join or participate in a community, you can support or contribute to a community. If you start out wanting to leverage or take advantage of a community then it might just not work out quite as intended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Along the lines of the missing stakeholder I have a few concerns about the end of the foreword to the action plan:</p>
<blockquote><p>This open source strategy addresses these key points. It sets out the steps we need to take across Government, and with our IT suppliers, to <strong>take advantage of</strong> the benefits of open source.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I for one don&#8217;t particularly want to be taken advantage of. I am not best keen on being leveraged either (a term I have seen somewhere in relation to this but I can&#8217;t find right now). This is community developed software. A community that welcomes with open arms the involvement of new <strong>participants</strong>. You can join or participate in a community, you can support or contribute to a community. If you start out wanting to leverage or take advantage of a community then it might just not work out quite as intended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
