<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Holes Exploited Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/12/20/microsoft-holes-exploited-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/12/20/microsoft-holes-exploited-again/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=microsoft-holes-exploited-again</link>
	<description>The Magic of Open Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:32:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Open Sourcerer &#187; OOXML Fataly Flawed?</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/12/20/microsoft-holes-exploited-again/comment-page-1/#comment-9961</link>
		<dc:creator>The Open Sourcerer &#187; OOXML Fataly Flawed?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=602#comment-9961</guid>
		<description>[...] the last few scant months, there have been several major and very serious security flaws and attack opportunities with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the last few scant months, there have been several major and very serious security flaws and attack opportunities with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Open Sourcerer &#187; Really Desperate Times for Fortify</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/12/20/microsoft-holes-exploited-again/comment-page-1/#comment-9855</link>
		<dc:creator>The Open Sourcerer &#187; Really Desperate Times for Fortify</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/?p=602#comment-9855</guid>
		<description>[...] I won&#8217;t dwell on the merits, or not, of the research itself. There are many excellent reports in the public domain that quite clearly demonstrate the strengths of the Open Source Software production model. Between proprietary and OSS methods I know which I believe is inherently more secure, and more robust too. Just recall on the last couple of months of Microsoft security holes. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I won&#8217;t dwell on the merits, or not, of the research itself. There are many excellent reports in the public domain that quite clearly demonstrate the strengths of the Open Source Software production model. Between proprietary and OSS methods I know which I believe is inherently more secure, and more robust too. Just recall on the last couple of months of Microsoft security holes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
