Comments on: Alfresco, a bit like Quickr but Bettr

By: Alan Bell

Alan Bell — Thu, 07 May 2009 09:41:14 +0000

Hi Paul,

I was using Alfresco Community Edition as of May 2008. I plan an updated article soon comparing the latest Quickr (which hasn’t really changed apart from some interesting new bugs) and the latest Alfresco Labs which we will hopefully be installing on our Libertus servers as an easy way to pilot Alfresco.

By: Paul HH

Paul HH — Thu, 07 May 2009 09:33:08 +0000

Which version and client of Alfresco were you using? Our newer Share client has a calendar, plus flash document reading, blaa, blaa, sales pitch. Themes for Share are also easy to create, we just haven’t had the time/priority to make an easy ‘add theme’ UI yet. Thanks for the praise!

By: Bob

Bob — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:43:15 +0000

I think you should make it clear you are referring to Quickr Domino. Quickr J2EE is a different beast altogether, with a lot more customizable and adjustable features.

By: Alan Lord

Alan Lord — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:47:24 +0000

The author of this piece can probably provide a good answer (as he was/is a Notes/Domino developer). I’ll forward your question to him.

Thanks for commenting.

By: John Verschooten

John Verschooten — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:34:10 +0000

What about Lotus Notes mail integration in Alfresco?
I have played with Alfresco and I like it very much, but the problem is that I need Lotus Notes mail integration in the company.

Grtz,
John

By: ajmccluskey.com » Blog Archive » Room to Improve

ajmccluskey.com » Blog Archive » Room to Improve — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:34:33 +0000

[...] Well, now that I’ve bitched about Quickr after singing its praises, I hope I’ve offered a somewhat balanced view of it after my limited experience with it. Please note I’m fairly new to the world of Lotus, and even more new to the world of Quickr, so if I’ve gotten it all wrong, don’t be afraid to let me know. For those of you who want to see some more negatives, check out The Open Sourcerer’s opinion. [...]