<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pet Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/03/14/pet-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/03/14/pet-project/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=pet-project</link>
	<description>The Magic of Open Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:02:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/03/14/pet-project/comment-page-1/#comment-14689</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 11:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/03/14/pet-project/#comment-14689</guid>
		<description>I ran a LFS 6.0 system for about a year or so. It took a little bit of work, but I could do ANYTHING I wanted to do on the system. In some cases I found it easier to work with than Fedora or Opensuse. LFS is a great project since it forces you to get your hands dirty. You&#039;ll learn a great deal about Linux during the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran a LFS 6.0 system for about a year or so. It took a little bit of work, but I could do ANYTHING I wanted to do on the system. In some cases I found it easier to work with than Fedora or Opensuse. LFS is a great project since it forces you to get your hands dirty. You&#8217;ll learn a great deal about Linux during the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/03/14/pet-project/comment-page-1/#comment-2332</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 02:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/03/14/pet-project/#comment-2332</guid>
		<description>@Alan,

I might just have to do that some time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alan,</p>
<p>I might just have to do that some time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Lord</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/03/14/pet-project/comment-page-1/#comment-2233</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Lord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/03/14/pet-project/#comment-2233</guid>
		<description>Hi Owen,

Thanks for commenting and hello.

PM for LFS has been discussed for many years but the recent debate on the lfs-dev mailing list basically concluded that LFS-ng should have one. If you have any ideas or suggestions to add to the pot, drop by the list (I use gmane for access: gmane.linux.lfs.devel) and say hi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Owen,</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting and hello.</p>
<p>PM for LFS has been discussed for many years but the recent debate on the lfs-dev mailing list basically concluded that LFS-ng should have one. If you have any ideas or suggestions to add to the pot, drop by the list (I use gmane for access: gmane.linux.lfs.devel) and say hi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/03/14/pet-project/comment-page-1/#comment-2194</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 02:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/03/14/pet-project/#comment-2194</guid>
		<description>I have been wanting to do Linux from scratch for the longest time, I just have never had the time to dedicate to it. A couple of years ago me and a friend were talking about it and thought of starting a &quot;Package Management From Scratch&quot; Project. Where basically a package management system would be built and totally usable for people with multiple LFS installs. I wonder if it would catch on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been wanting to do Linux from scratch for the longest time, I just have never had the time to dedicate to it. A couple of years ago me and a friend were talking about it and thought of starting a &#8220;Package Management From Scratch&#8221; Project. Where basically a package management system would be built and totally usable for people with multiple LFS installs. I wonder if it would catch on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Lord</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/03/14/pet-project/comment-page-1/#comment-1595</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Lord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/03/14/pet-project/#comment-1595</guid>
		<description>Hi BobCFC,

Thanks for your comments.

Using a VM is a good idea, although I&#039;ve never tried building LFS in one myself. It is fairly straightforward to start and stop the LFS build process; there are only a few mount commands that need to be redone and a chroot if you are into chapter 6.

The LFS LiveCD is a good point. Thanks for mentioning that. In fact, it was a question regarding the purpose of the LiveCD, that was the originating point for the whole &quot;lets refresh LFS&quot; debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi BobCFC,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments.</p>
<p>Using a VM is a good idea, although I&#8217;ve never tried building LFS in one myself. It is fairly straightforward to start and stop the LFS build process; there are only a few mount commands that need to be redone and a chroot if you are into chapter 6.</p>
<p>The LFS LiveCD is a good point. Thanks for mentioning that. In fact, it was a question regarding the purpose of the LiveCD, that was the originating point for the whole &#8220;lets refresh LFS&#8221; debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobCFC</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/03/14/pet-project/comment-page-1/#comment-1593</link>
		<dc:creator>BobCFC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 06:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/03/14/pet-project/#comment-1593</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m having another go at LFS now that virtualisation is viable.  I can have a project on the back burner in VirtualBox and literally pause it and continue from where I left off, which was one of the biggest hurdles for newbies in the old days, many of whom left their PCs on for days/weeks.

Also worth mentioning that there is a LFS LiveCD.  It has all the source tarballs gathered on the bootable CD as well as a copy of the book, which is helpful because they say you must use the same file versions as the edition of the book you are reading to prevent conflicts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m having another go at LFS now that virtualisation is viable.  I can have a project on the back burner in VirtualBox and literally pause it and continue from where I left off, which was one of the biggest hurdles for newbies in the old days, many of whom left their PCs on for days/weeks.</p>
<p>Also worth mentioning that there is a LFS LiveCD.  It has all the source tarballs gathered on the bootable CD as well as a copy of the book, which is helpful because they say you must use the same file versions as the edition of the book you are reading to prevent conflicts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

