<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OOXML: Feeling the heat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/02/15/ooxml-feeling-the-heat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/02/15/ooxml-feeling-the-heat/</link>
	<description>The Magic of Open Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:57:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan Lord</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/02/15/ooxml-feeling-the-heat/comment-page-1/#comment-878</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Lord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/02/15/ooxml-feeling-the-heat/#comment-878</guid>
		<description>@Istvan

Thanks for your input.

Reading Rick&#039;s blog was like swimming through treacle... After reading this comment from Rick on this post: http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2008/01/editors_disposition_of_comment.html I assumed that meant what it said... 

&quot;(Full disclosure: I am due to be helping out Rex’s team in some way with editorial gruntwork this month. The above is my own opinion.)

However, following on a later post - deep in the comments -  (http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2008/02/significant_open_letter_from_p.html) he states thus:

&quot;Phil: No I am not an Ecma employee....&quot; 

Although I must say that that is not *quite* the same thing as being &quot;paid by&quot; which he has not refuted at all.

However, I&#039;m sure you are correct so I will edit the above post.

Once again thanks for your comments and interest in pursuing an open and transparent process for this important work of global standardisation.

Alan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Istvan</p>
<p>Thanks for your input.</p>
<p>Reading Rick&#8217;s blog was like swimming through treacle&#8230; After reading this comment from Rick on this post: <a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2008/01/editors_disposition_of_comment.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2008/01/editors_disposition_of_comment.html</a> I assumed that meant what it said&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8220;(Full disclosure: I am due to be helping out Rex’s team in some way with editorial gruntwork this month. The above is my own opinion.)</p>
<p>However, following on a later post &#8211; deep in the comments &#8211;  (<a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2008/02/significant_open_letter_from_p.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2008/02/significant_open_letter_from_p.html</a>) he states thus:</p>
<p>&#8220;Phil: No I am not an Ecma employee&#8230;.&#8221; </p>
<p>Although I must say that that is not *quite* the same thing as being &#8220;paid by&#8221; which he has not refuted at all.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m sure you are correct so I will edit the above post.</p>
<p>Once again thanks for your comments and interest in pursuing an open and transparent process for this important work of global standardisation.</p>
<p>Alan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Istvan Sebestyen</title>
		<link>http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/02/15/ooxml-feeling-the-heat/comment-page-1/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>Istvan Sebestyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/02/15/ooxml-feeling-the-heat/#comment-875</guid>
		<description>&quot;Rick Jelliffe, almost legendary in his dealings with Microsoft, and a staunch supporter of the proposed format (ECMA-376) with almost nae a criticism to emanate from his mouth or fingers, has confirmed that:

1. He is being paid by ECMA/Microsoft&quot;

I, as Secretary General of Ecma International can confirm that this statement is simply untrue. Ecma International is in no way paying this gentleman, for anything. I even would not pay for anybody who is part of the Ecma delegation, let alone for someone who is not, and I have never met in my life....Congratulations for your &quot;objective&quot; writing......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Rick Jelliffe, almost legendary in his dealings with Microsoft, and a staunch supporter of the proposed format (ECMA-376) with almost nae a criticism to emanate from his mouth or fingers, has confirmed that:</p>
<p>1. He is being paid by ECMA/Microsoft&#8221;</p>
<p>I, as Secretary General of Ecma International can confirm that this statement is simply untrue. Ecma International is in no way paying this gentleman, for anything. I even would not pay for anybody who is part of the Ecma delegation, let alone for someone who is not, and I have never met in my life&#8230;.Congratulations for your &#8220;objective&#8221; writing&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
